Call us toll-free

In some hypothesis test, H0: µ = 12.

In some hypothesis test, H1: µ 12.

Approximate price


275 Words


Use a two-tailed test and let ALPHA = .02.

The isn’t used very often (because we rarely know the actual population ). However, it’s a good idea to understand how it works as it’s one of the simplest tests you can perform in hypothesis testing. In English class you got to learn the basics (like grammar and spelling) before you could write a story; think of one sample z tests as the foundation for understanding more complex hypothesis testing. This page contains two hypothesis testing examples for .

It is desirable to test the hypothe- sis that the mean is greater than 50, with ALPHA = .025.

In conjunction to the ‘Archipterygium hypothesis’ (, right side), ‘Fin fold hypothesis’ (, centre) and new ideas related with gene patterning, we will examine the tail bud as a structure from which potentially the developmental mechanism for the appendage development was co-opted. This idea builds up on previously suggested similarities between the tail and limb buds (; ) and the hypothesis of Axis paramorphism (, ).

One tail test at ALPHA = .01, therefore Z = 2.33.

For testing the hypothesis MU = 28 against the alternative MU =/= 28 at the 0.10 level, the critical values are: a.

Im having a hard time answer a problem. The genetics and IV I situate conduct a clinical trial of the YOSORT method designed to increase the probability of a boy and 239 of them were Boyd’s. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the YOSORT method is effective in increasing the like hood that a baby will be a boy . I have to identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test status is, p-value or critical value .

Would you reject the hypothesis H(0):MU = 72 versus the alternative H(1):MU =/= 72 on the basis of the observations, when testing at level ALPHA = .05?

Two Tail Hypothesis test - Mathematics Stack Exchange

Identify the critical value suitable for conducting a two-tail test of the hypothesis at the 2% level.

Ficetola GF, Bonardi A, Colleoni E, Padoa-Schioppa E and Scali S. 2013. Evolution of sexual dimorphism in the number of tail vertebrae in salamanders: comparing multiple hypotheses. 40: 220-227.

Sample problem: A sample of 200 people has a mean age of 21 with a population standard deviation (σ) of 5. Test the hypothesis that the population mean is 18.9 at α = 0.05.

One tailed hypothesis tests. - University of Houston
Order now
  • Two tail hypothesis test example | …

    two-tail test -- used when the alternate hypothesis, H 1, is µ k, …

  • Should I use One-tailed or Two-tailed Hypothesis Tests?

    Should I use One-tailed or Two-tailed Hypothesis Tests

  • Edu write 2 tailed hypothesis - Veloactif

    Saved two tail hypothesis testing again and tedious Quenti rolls his swimmers forks shuns furiously

Order now

05/01/2018 · One tailed hypothesis tests

Next, you’ll need to state the null hypothesis (See: ). That’s what will happen if the researcher is wrong. In the above example, if the researcher is wrong then the recovery time is less than or equal to 8.2 weeks. In math, that’s:
H0 μ ≤ 8.2

Hypothesis Testing of a Single Population Mean

The main purpose of statistics is to test a hypothesis. For example, you might run an experiment and find that a certain drug is effective at treating headaches. But if you can’t repeat that experiment, no one will take your results seriously. A good example of this was the discovery, which petered into obscurity because no one was able to duplicate the results.

Hypothesis Testing Calculator - Learning about Electronics

The idea that limb and tail buds present similar development was first mentioned by ) and later suggested again by other authors (). At the same time it also matches the idea of Axis paramorphism as long as the tail is considered as an appendage itself. Histologically the VER and the AER correspond to an ectodermal epithelial tissue that covers proliferative mesenchyme. In both cases the epithelium/mesenchyme interaction is important for the proliferation of mesodermal cells (). In zebrafish there is a ‘tail organizer’, in the sense of been the source of signaling pathway components such as Wnt, Bmp and Nodal (), in a similar way that the ZPA is a source of Shh in the tetrapod limb bud (). Additionally, in mouse, a mutation in the gene produces the phenotype called in which the VER and the AER are very thin and there is an abnormal development of both limbs and tail (; ). Concerning the development of limbs, the Shh pathway has been studied extensively and it is associated with the antero-posterior polarization processes (). The presence of Shh was detected in the posterior regions of tetrapod limbs (), teleost fish (), the little skate () and sharks ((Müller and Henle, 1838) and ) (; ) (). The caudal fin of zebrafish expresses transcripts of several genes (e.g. and ) present in the Shh signaling pathway (; ). In mouse there is expression in the caudal region, however it is in the future spinal cord area (). As this expression occurs later in development (day 9.5) it is probably not related with the formation of the tail itself. Elements from the Bmp pathway are expressed recurrently in both structures (). For example, is expressed in the chicken AER (), the mouse limb bud () and the zebrafish pectoral fin (). It is also present in the mouse VER from the earliest stages until the growth of the tail finishes. Another gene from this pathway is , in mouse it is present in the AER (), but not in the VER (). In addition, many BMPs have been detected in the caudal fin primordium of zebrafish (). A final example is Bmp11, which is present in the tail bud and also in the limb bud of (). Several proteins of the Wnt pathway are found in vertebrate limbs and tails (). Wnt3a is expressed in mice limbs (), as well as the most caudal portion of the tail bud (). Mice carrying null alleles for have truncated tail bud development, but there was no major effect on the extremities (). It could suggest the expression of other genes with redundant functions or the fact that is actually involved in other developmental processes on the limb. For chicken has been reported in the AER (). In zebrafish, Wnt3a is expressed in the AER () and morpholino knockdowns of and completely blocked the formation of the tail (). Consistent with this phenotype, expression is detected at the tip of the tail in zebrafish (). Moreover, the exogenous application of Wnt8c on the flank of chicken embryos induces the formation of an ectopic limb (). and are also expressed in the chicken AER (). The first one has a role related with the growth of the underlying mesenchyme (). The same gene is expressed in the pectoral fins of medaka, (Temminck and Schlegel, 1846) (). In mouse, is involved in the proliferation of branchial arches, facial protrusions, limb bud, VER (), fingers and genitals. In the mutant many of these tissues, including the tail and limbs, present a truncation in their growth (). The expression of this gene in the branchial arches could also be considered as an argument in favor of the Archipterygium Hypothesis. In addition, has a pattern of expression in the tail that is very similar to the one observed for (). On the other hand, during the regeneration process of the tadpole tail, it is possible to detect the expression of and (). Another example is , which is expressed in the tail bud of zebrafish (), chicken () and (), as well as in the limbs of chicken () and mouse (). Finally, the effector of the Wnt pathway, , is expressed in the mouse limbs and tail (). A very important gene family for limb development corresponds to the Fgf genes; interestingly very few of these genes are expressed in the tail (). On mouse AER the genes and are expressed, but only the latter is present in the VER (). In zebrafish, is expressed in the pectoral fin, tail and gill arches (). Another gene in this family, , is expressed in the mesenchyme of the pectoral fin () and in the tail bud of zebrafish (). No orthologues were found for this gene in tetrapods, but it is present in Chondrichthyes (). Functionally in mice, the maintenance of the AER depends only on Fgf10 () and there is no presence of this transcript in the VER (). The mutant mouse for this gene lacks lungs and anterior and posterior limbs (). Along the same line, during the regeneration process of the tadpole tail there is expression of and (). The Sprouty family of proteins is antagonist of receptor tyrosine kinases, including FGF receptors. and are expressed in the mouse extremities and in the VER (; ) (). In addition, is expressed in the zebrafish pectoral fin (). Also, there are a number of common transcription factors between the two structures (). Several genes of the Msx family ( and) are expressed in pectoral fins and the fin fold, including the caudal fin of zebrafish (). In mice, , functionally related to in zebrafish (), is expressed in the VER () and AER (). Other example is , which is expressed in the mouse limb and the zebrafish fin (), as well as in the tails of both organisms (). Another transcription factor that is found in a wide variety of appendages is (). The Tbx transcription factors are also important in limb and tail development (). In chicken, is expressed in the AER and in the tail bud, among other structures (). In the Japanese newt, (Boie, 1826), is expressed in the tail and the limb (). The Hox genes are usually related with segmental differentiation, but they also present shared expression between tail and limbs (). In Mexican axolotls, (Shaw and Nodder, 1798), there is expression of and (short transcript) in the tip of the tail as well as in the hindlimb and in lower levels of the forelimbs (). In mice, () and () are expressed in the limb and tail bud. In zebrafish, the genes (), (), and () are expressed in the pectoral fin and the tail bud. Finally, in there is also expression of in the tail fin (). ) proposed a possible relationship between the adult caudal fin of fishes and the autopod of tetrapods. The author suggests that the genes could be responsible for the axis bending which causes the heterocercal condition in fishes in the same way as they are responsible for the proximodistal finger specification of the tetrapod limb. In this scenario, genes would have been recruited secondarily for limb development. All these similarities between the genetic mechanism involved in limb and tail formation are also congruent with the Axis paramorphism idea (, ). On this conceptual framework, both structures could be considered as repetitions of the main body axis. Note that the tail is also a structure that presents sexual dimorphism. It has been documented on the tail length of birds () and snakes (); number of vertebrae in salamanders (); and colours on birds () and fish (). While it is often possible to identify mutations with a limb phenotype having no consequence in the tail or vice versa, this could be explained by the existence of functional redundancies in one of the tissues.

t- Test in Excel - EASY Excel Tutorial

) and ) independently developed the Fin Fold Hypothesis; it says that paired fins evolved from ribbon-like fins, which extended along the sides of basal vertebrates. This idea correlates with the observations in early vertebrates (e.g. and ; ), as well as the presence of metapleural folds on the sides of the body of amphioxus ( (Pallas, 1774); ). However, conceptually it is problematic because there is no evidence, which supports the existence of muscle and endoskeleton, so they are not considered true appendages. During the larval stages of development in many fish species it is possible to recognize a single continuous median fin, which, later partially degenerates and forms the median fins (). It does not match the structure suggested by the Fin Fold hypothesis, but demonstrates a link between a continuous fin and median fins. In fact, the positional symmetry between the dorsal and anal fin has been interpreted as a modular system, which ancestrally could have been a single structure (; ). In zebrafish, (Hamilton-Buchanan, 1822), the median fin grows starting at 16 hours post fertilization (hpf), from caudal towards anterior. Its growth is accompanied by the expression of and , both gene families are also expressed in the pectoral fins (). At 30 hpf the expression of ,, and can be found along the whole fold (). All of these genes, except , are expressed in the ectodermal and mesodermal portion of the median fin fold and in the pectoral fin bud. appears only in the mesodermal tissue (). Additionally, expression of the adhesion protein Laminin α5 has been found in pectoral fins as well as in the median fin fold (). Studies in chondrichthyes have also demonstrated gene expression shared between unpaired (median) and paired fins (). These comparisons are also valid between other vertebrate species. For example, the median fins of the small spotted catshark, (Linnaeus, 1758), express Hoxd ( and ) and genes. All of the Hoxd genes are also expressed in different stages of development in chicken limbs (), while is expressed in the forelimbs and somites of chicken (). Perhaps the most compelling line of evidence supporting this hypothesis is the existence of lateral bands of ectoderm competent for AER induction. They correspond to territories that exposed to certain stimuli, such as the presence of or , produce an ectopic AER and limb. In the chicken three bands of competent ectoderm have been reported: one in the dorsal midline of the body from neck to tail, while the other two are on the flanks between the anterior and posterior limbs. Induction of ectopic limbs is restricted to a particular time window (). Something similar has been found in newts (). An extreme case corresponds to the common skate ( (Müller and Henle, 1841)) where a continuous band of suggests that its pectoral fins use the whole lateral stripe of competence (). Because of all these gene expression and anatomical evidence, the median fin fold has been considered as a possible ancestral fin (). However, explicit mechanism of how a single median fin fold duplicated to create the paired fins is not fully clear. An alternative explanation corresponds to the ventralization of the developmental program present in the median fins into the formation of the lateral fins which would have happen through the differentiation of the lateral plate mesoderm (). As a requirement for the fin formation it seems necessary the ventralization of the expression field of , which has a most dorsal limit at the lateral plate mesoderm in gnathostomes (). Then, the evolutionary transition between median fins and paired fins occurred within the somitic mesoderm ().

Order now
  • Kim

    "I have always been impressed by the quick turnaround and your thoroughness. Easily the most professional essay writing service on the web."

  • Paul

    "Your assistance and the first class service is much appreciated. My essay reads so well and without your help I'm sure I would have been marked down again on grammar and syntax."

  • Ellen

    "Thanks again for your excellent work with my assignments. No doubts you're true experts at what you do and very approachable."

  • Joyce

    "Very professional, cheap and friendly service. Thanks for writing two important essays for me, I wouldn't have written it myself because of the tight deadline."

  • Albert

    "Thanks for your cautious eye, attention to detail and overall superb service. Thanks to you, now I am confident that I can submit my term paper on time."

  • Mary

    "Thank you for the GREAT work you have done. Just wanted to tell that I'm very happy with my essay and will get back with more assignments soon."

Ready to tackle your homework?

Place an order